Menendez Conviction Stands Despite Evidence Error
U.S. prosecutors affirmed that despite the jury's review of improper evidence, former Senator Robert Menendez's corruption conviction remains upheld. Menendez, who resigned in August, was found guilty of accepting bribes. The decision follows a complex nine-week trial, with Menendez planning to appeal.
In a decisive move, U.S. prosecutors announced that the corruption conviction of former Senator Robert Menendez will not be overturned despite the jury's examination of inadmissible evidence during their deliberations.
Menendez, 70, resigned in August after being convicted in Manhattan federal court for accepting bribes, including gold bars and cash, in exchange for political influence. Prosecutors emphasized that the integrity of the verdict remains intact, asserting the evidence of guilt was compelling.
The court's decision reflects Menendez's grave breaches of law, including acting as an Egyptian government agent and obstructing justice. With sentencing scheduled for January, Menendez could face a lengthy prison term, as New Jersey voters recently elected Andy Kim as his successor.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Delhi Court Acquits Trio: No Evidence Found
Delhi Court Discharges Rape Accused Amid Evidence Contradictions
No Evidence of Secret Abortions: Nigeria's Human Rights Commission Clears Military
New Martian Evidence: Ancient Ocean Unveiled
Supreme Court Demands Evidence on Manipuri Ethnic Violence Allegations