Menendez Conviction Stands Despite Evidence Error
U.S. prosecutors affirmed that despite the jury's review of improper evidence, former Senator Robert Menendez's corruption conviction remains upheld. Menendez, who resigned in August, was found guilty of accepting bribes. The decision follows a complex nine-week trial, with Menendez planning to appeal.
In a decisive move, U.S. prosecutors announced that the corruption conviction of former Senator Robert Menendez will not be overturned despite the jury's examination of inadmissible evidence during their deliberations.
Menendez, 70, resigned in August after being convicted in Manhattan federal court for accepting bribes, including gold bars and cash, in exchange for political influence. Prosecutors emphasized that the integrity of the verdict remains intact, asserting the evidence of guilt was compelling.
The court's decision reflects Menendez's grave breaches of law, including acting as an Egyptian government agent and obstructing justice. With sentencing scheduled for January, Menendez could face a lengthy prison term, as New Jersey voters recently elected Andy Kim as his successor.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
No Evidence of Secret Abortions: Nigeria's Human Rights Commission Clears Military
Supreme Court Demands Evidence on Manipuri Ethnic Violence Allegations
Court Dismisses Rape Allegations: Chat Evidence Overrules Claims
JMM-Cong-RJD indulge in corruption in J’khand, bribes taken to issue death certificates, alleges Rajnath Singh.
J&K CM Omar Abdullah demands court martial of Army personnel involved in Kishtwar incident, if evidence proves torture.