LNG’s Hidden Climate Cost: More Polluting than Coal

A new study reveals that Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) has a greenhouse gas footprint worse than coal over 20 years. The energy-intensive processes of supercooling, transporting, and fracking increase LNG's impact. Despite being considered a low-carbon alternative, LNG could exacerbate climate change more than coal.

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is touted as a cleaner fuel compared to coal. However, a groundbreaking study has revealed shocking data that challenges this perception. Conducted by Robert Howarth, a professor at Cornell University, the study found that LNG's environmental footprint is significantly more damaging than previously thought.

Energy-intensive processes involved in the extraction, liquefaction, and transportation of LNG contribute to its higher greenhouse gas emissions. Contrary to the belief that it's a bridge fuel, LNG leaves a larger carbon footprint than coal when considering its entire lifecycle, particularly over a 20-year period.

India's policy to fuel heavy-duty trucks with LNG raises concerns about long-term climate impacts, as studies indicate that deploying LNG could increase methane and carbon dioxide emissions. This challenges its efficacy as a replacement for diesel in reducing environmental pollution.

(With inputs from agencies.)