Massachusetts vs. Meta: The Battle Over Instagram's Impact on Youth

Massachusetts is suing Meta Platforms over claims that Instagram's addictive features harm young users' mental health. A Boston judge ruled the lawsuit could proceed, rejecting Meta's defense that federal law protected it from such claims. The case highlights concerns about Instagram's potential psychological impact on teenagers.

Meta Platforms is facing a lawsuit filed by Massachusetts, alleging that the company intentionally designed Instagram features to addict young users and misrepresented the risks to teenage mental health. A judge ruled against Meta's request to dismiss the lawsuit, allowing Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell's claims to proceed.

The social media giant argued that the case was precluded by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a federal law that often shields internet platforms from content liability. However, the judge stated this law did not cover Meta's allegedly misleading statements regarding Instagram's safety and age-verification measures.

In response, Campbell emphasized the importance of holding Meta liable for its business practices. Meta, disagreeing with the ruling, maintains its commitment to youth safety. The Massachusetts case is among notable state-level efforts to address concerns about social media's effect on young people.

(With inputs from agencies.)