Legal Clash: Trump's Deportation Plans Hit Judicial Roadblock
President Trump criticizes Chief Judge James Boasberg after a federal ruling blocks the deportation of Venezuelan immigrants. Boasberg's decision, which impedes Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged gang members, sparks legal controversy and fierce political debate, while an appeals court prepares to hear arguments.

- Country:
- United States
On Monday, President Donald Trump publicly questioned the impartiality of Chief Judge James Boasberg, who halted his administration's efforts to deport Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador. Trump's criticism emerged as the administration filed an appeal against the federal judge's order.
As tensions escalate, Trump accused Boasberg of bias due to the judge's participation in a conference with 'anti-Trump speakers.' Boasberg has refused to revoke his ruling, citing the public's vested interest in ensuring individuals are not wrongly deported. The deportation endeavor leverages a rarely used wartime law, transferring migrants alleged as gang members without standard judicial review.
The case, now before the US Court of Appeals, raises significant legal questions about executive power and the Alien Enemies Act. Government lawyers argue Boasberg overstepped executive authority, while civil rights advocates warn of dangerous precedents. The conflict sparks calls for Boasberg's impeachment, although Chief Justice John Roberts defends the judiciary's independence from political retribution.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
EU Condemns Thailand's Deportation of Uyghurs Amid Human Rights Concerns
Deportation Debate: The Clash of Free Speech and Foreign Policy
US Sanctions Shake Thailand Over Uyghur Deportations
Controversial Deportations: Khalil's Case Challenges First Amendment
US Sanctions Thai Officials Over Uyghur Deportations