Debate Over Judiciary Appointments: Lineage vs. Merit

The Supreme Court collegium is considering a proposal to prevent the appointment of judges' close relatives in high courts. This measure aims to promote inclusivity and merit-based appointments, though it may exclude deserving candidates due to family ties. The idea involves re-evaluating lineage-driven perceptions in judicial appointments.

The Supreme Court's collegium is debating a significant proposition to restrict the appointment of judges' relatives in high courts, sources revealed. This initiative, if implemented, seeks to combat the perception that family connections outweigh merit in the judiciary, thus fostering greater inclusivity.

This proposal, driven by a senior judge's recommendation, suggests instructing high court collegiums to avoid endorsing candidates related to current or former judges. While potentially disqualifying deserving candidates, it could open positions for first-generation lawyers, enhancing the representation of diverse communities in high courts.

The move follows the recent controversy involving Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, where the Supreme Court sought clarification on his remarks. The apex court has been initiating personal interactions with judicial nominees, marking a shift from reliance on biodata, enhancing the transparency of appointments.

(With inputs from agencies.)