High Stakes: Richard Glossip's Fight for Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing the conviction of Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip, who claims prosecutors withheld evidence in his 1997 murder-for-hire case. New evidence questions witness credibility, leading to appeals for a retrial. The justices are expected to rule by June.

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a case that could impact the fate of Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip, who seeks to overturn his 1997 murder-for-hire conviction. The discussion centers on previously undisclosed evidence that Glossip argues should grant him a retrial.

Glossip was convicted of arranging the murder of Barry Van Treese, relying heavily on testimony from Justin Sneed, the actual perpetrator. Sneed's credibility is now under scrutiny, as prosecutors allegedly withheld critical information, including Sneed's mental health issues and statements about his medication.

This unusual case is underscored by the involvement of Oklahoma's Attorney General, who supports Glossip's appeal due to prosecutorial misconduct. The Supreme Court temporarily stayed Glossip's execution, with a decision expected by June.

(With inputs from agencies.)