Oregon Judge Overturns $260 Million Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson
An Oregon judge has overturned a $260 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson in a mesothelioma case linked to asbestos exposure from its talc powder. The judge has called for a new trial, citing errors by the plaintiff's lawyers. The decision does not affect J&J's broader talc litigation issues.
An Oregon judge has nullified a $260 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson, brought by a woman claiming mesothelioma from the company's talc powder, J&J reported on Monday.
Judge Katharine von ter Stegge of Portland's 4th Judicial District Circuit Court accepted J&J's motion for a retrial, citing significant errors by the plaintiff's legal team. An explanatory opinion from von ter Stegge is anticipated shortly. Erik Haas, J&J's worldwide vice president of litigation, described the initial verdict as legally and scientifically unsound.
Lawyer Kyung Lee, representing the plaintiff, did not respond immediately. J&J faces over 62,000 claims alleging their talc products caused cancer, though the company maintains these do not contain asbestos and are safe. Lee, diagnosed with mesothelioma last year, attributed her illness to decades of using J&J's talc products. J&J's counsel argued her condition stemmed from nearby asbestos exposure, unrelated to their products.
J&J is moving towards a $9 billion bankruptcy settlement for ovarian and gynecological cancer claims, backed by over 75% of claimants. This settlement excludes mesothelioma cases like Lee's. (Reporting by Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Leslie Adler)
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- Johnson & Johnson
- verdict
- talc powder
- mesothelioma
- asbestos
- lawsuit
- court
- Oregon
- retrial
- legal errors
ALSO READ
Supreme Court Elections: The Battle Over Abortion Rights Shifts to States
Historic Legal Victory: French Court Rejects Sulu Sultan Heirs' $15 Billion Claim
Rouse Avenue Court Pushes for Swift Sanctions in 'Land for Job' Scam
Supreme Court Upholds Fair Recruitment Practices in Landmark Ruling
Controversy Brews Over Supreme Court's Library Conversion