Supreme Court Emphasizes National Interest in Fair Arbitration Practices

The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of fair arbitration processes for encouraging private sector investment. Headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, a five-judge bench discussed whether an ineligible person can nominate an arbitrator. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stressed that improving arbitration is crucial for both domestic and foreign investments.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 29-08-2024 19:35 IST | Created: 29-08-2024 19:35 IST
Supreme Court Emphasizes National Interest in Fair Arbitration Practices
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Supreme Court on Thursday emphasized the crucial national interest in ensuring fair arbitration processes, vital for instilling private sector confidence in alternative dispute resolution mechanisms essential for investments in the country.

A five-judge constitution bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud noted that the government's interest extends beyond just favourable arbitration outcomes.

The bench, including justices Hrishikesh Roy, P S Narasimha, J B Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, is addressing the legal question of whether a person ineligible to be an arbitrator can nominate another. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta asserted the importance of fostering growth in arbitration for eliminating obstacles, particularly those affecting government agencies.

Chief Justice Chandrachud remarked that private investment is pivotal for national growth and that a fair arbitration process is in vital public interest. He also stressed the necessity of earning the private sector's trust, not just from foreign investors but domestic ones too.

The solicitor general pointed out that arbitration fundamentally stems from contractual agreements, which are acts of volition. During discussions, the bench acknowledged the need for a government panel of arbitrators for public undertakings, with Mehta agreeing in principle.

During the extended arguments, it was noted that the government is attentive to reform proposals, such as those from the T K Vishwanathan-led expert panel, to streamline arbitration laws and alleviate the judicial burden, positioning India as a hub for international arbitration.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback