India's Diplomatic Rebuttal: Transparency Laws and Global Conflicts

India has objected to UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk's comments on foreign influence laws. Ambassador Arindam Bagchi stated that transparency principles shouldn't be applied selectively, emphasizing India’s long-standing regulations. Bagchi noted global conflicts have further polarized the Human Rights Council and affirmed India’s election integrity and democratic values.

India has taken a firm stance against recent remarks made by the UN's top human rights official concerning foreign influence laws. Ambassador Arindam Bagchi, India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva, strongly countered UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk's comments at the Global Update during the 56th session of the Human Rights Council this week.

Bagchi emphasized that principles of transparency and accountability must be universally applied, arguing that labeling the use of foreign funds as opaque or illegal misrepresents India's dynamic civil society. He further highlighted that global conflicts have regrettably heightened divisions within the Human Rights Council.

Bagchi also pointed out the High Commissioner's bleak assessment of global human rights, contrasting it with the success and integrity of India's recently concluded general elections, touted as the largest democratic exercise worldwide, reinforcing robust institutional safeguards and democratic values.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)