Supreme Court Questions Delay in Remission Files Signed by CM Kejriwal

The Supreme Court sought explanations for delays in signing remission files by jailed Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, emphasizing the necessity to address whether there's any restraint on his duties. The court emphasized its constitutional powers to avoid stalling key issues affecting many cases.

The Supreme Court inquired on Friday if there were any restrictions preventing jailed Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal from signing remission files for prisoners. Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih raised the question upon learning that a convict's file seeking early release was delayed due to Kejriwal's signature.

The apex court asked if there was a restraint order hindering Kejriwal from signing remission files from jail. Notably, Kejriwal is incarcerated in connection with the alleged liquor policy irregularities case. Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati and Senior Advocate Archana Dave, representing the respondents, assured they would seek instructions on this matter.

The Supreme Court stressed that relevant rules must be presented, asserting its authority under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution to prevent unnecessary delays in such significant issues. The court adjourned the matter, emphasizing the examination of any restraint on Kejriwal performing his duties from jail, which could impact hundreds of cases.

The hearing concerned a plea from a convict seeking remission. On May 10, Delhi Government counsel informed the court that the concerned Board was considering the petitioner's permanent remission request.

On July 19, the court granted the Delhi Government additional time to decide, extending the period by one month. Upon recognizing further delays in file processing, the court reiterated that prolonged pendency couldn't be allowed (ANI).

(With inputs from agencies.)