Daniil Medvedev's Rollercoaster Victory: Losing Track at Wimbledon

Daniil Medvedev faced a challenging second-round match at Wimbledon against Frenchman Alexandre Muller. He mistakenly thought he'd lost the first set but quickly realized his error and bounced back, ultimately winning the match after over three hours. Medvedev humorously recounted his moment of confusion post-match.

Fifth seed Daniil Medvedev was being pushed so hard by Frenchman Alexandre Muller in their Wimbledon second round clash on Centre Court on Wednesday that he completely lost track of the score. After losing a point to trail 6-3 in a tiebreak the Russian sat down on his court-side chair thinking he had already lost the opening set to his 102nd-ranked opponent.

He was then informed by the umpire that he was actually still alive in the first set and he returned to the baseline, only to lose the next point anyway and fall behind. Despite losing that tiebreak it all turned out OK for Medvedev as he hit back to reach the third round by winning the next three sets in a row.

"I thought it was 6-4 (not 5-3), I went a little crazy," Medvedev told reporters. "I thought the set was gone. I heard the referee talking to me. At one moment I start hearing, 'Daniil, it's 6-3, 6-3'. I'm like, 'What are you talking about?' "Then I see the score. Don't know if it ever happened to me before. Thought it was pretty funny. I thought in my head, 'OK, maybe that's my second chance to win it'. Then I lost the point."

It was a tough workout for Medvedev who was extended well beyond three hours, but he was happy to survive a potential banana skin and reach the third round. Muller had clearly done his homework and chucked in the odd underarm serve with Medvedev standing to receive serve from his customary position, well behind the baseline.

"The first one you're kind of surprised. But I was on to both serves and I could have done better," he said. "I wanted to do one myself when I was serving for the match, maybe at 40-0, but I ran out of time."

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)