High Court Battle Over British Oil Licenses: Climate vs. Exploration

Britain's issuance of 28 oil and gas exploration licences is being challenged in London's High Court, with campaigners arguing the government neglected climate change impacts. Oceana UK, a marine conservation group, claims risks to marine life were overlooked. Britain's energy department opposes, stating further assessments will ensure safety.

The legal battle over Britain's decision to grant 28 oil and gas exploration licenses is unfolding in London's High Court. Campaigners argue that the government failed to adequately consider climate impacts, while Oceana UK claims risks to protected marine life were disregarded.

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero counters that the licenses pertain only to early exploration, promising further assessments before production. The case highlights the growing trend of environmentalists using legal avenues to combat climate change issues.

This challenge follows a Supreme Court ruling requiring authorities to consider the burning of fossil fuels during project approvals, putting pressure on new oil and gas initiatives in the North Sea, despite Prime Minister Keir Starmer's support for ongoing fossil fuel projects.

(With inputs from agencies.)