Debate Intensifies Over Simultaneous Elections Bill

Attorney General R. Venkatramani assured a parliamentary panel that the bills for simultaneous elections align with the Constitution, despite opposition concerns. Former Chief Justice D. N. Patel highlighted advantages like policy continuity but warned of federalism concerns. The committee is evaluating expert views to finalize recommendations.

In a key parliamentary discussion, Attorney General R. Venkatramani reassured members that the proposed simultaneous elections bills are legally sound and do not infringe on the Constitution, according to sources.

Despite reassurances from legal experts, opposition parties raised alarms, deeming the bills unconstitutional. Former Chief Justice D. N. Patel presented a balanced view, citing potential benefits such as policy continuity and cost reductions, while acknowledging challenges like federalism concerns and necessary constitutional amendments.

The committee, chaired by BJP MP P. P. Chaudhary, is mulling over these expert insights to shape its recommendations, as the debate highlights divergent views on the ''One Nation One Election'' concept.

(With inputs from agencies.)