Supreme Court Collegium Considers Radical Reform Proposals
The Supreme Court collegium is considering proposals to prevent the appointment of judges' relatives, aiming to address perceived nepotism in judicial appointments. Noted lawyer Abhishek Singhvi supports the reform and suggests more radical methods to assess judges' and lawyers' competencies. The reform could enhance inclusivity but may deny deserving candidates.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court collegium is considering significant reforms in judicial appointments, raising discussions around perceived nepotism. Noted lawyer and Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi has advocated for swift implementation of these proposals, citing the need for more objectivity in appointments.
The proposals suggest preventing the appointment of judges' close relatives in high courts, an idea Singhvi has long endorsed. Singhvi argues that the current appointment process involves 'mutual back-scratching' and favors family lineages, undermining the judiciary's integrity.
The collegium's move to interview candidates personally is seen as a step forward from traditional methods. However, concerns remain that the proposed reforms might unjustly exclude qualified candidates related to judges, despite potentially broadening representation in the judiciary.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Bihar's Book Selection Controversy: Nepotism or Merit?
US Domestic Policy Overhaul: Defense, Social Security, Judicial Appointments, and Key Nominations in Focus
Biden's Historic Judicial Appointments Surpass Trump's First-Term Record
Mass Protest in Belgrade: Calling Out Corruption and Nepotism
Judicial Appointments Shake-Up in Indian High Courts