Facebook's Legal Hurdles: Supreme Court Declines Involvement in Data Fraud Case

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule on a Facebook securities fraud lawsuit, letting a lower court decision allowing the case to proceed stand. The case involves allegations that Facebook misled investors about a data breach linked to Cambridge Analytica, affecting millions of users and impacting stock value.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 22-11-2024 22:44 IST | Created: 22-11-2024 22:44 IST
Facebook's Legal Hurdles: Supreme Court Declines Involvement in Data Fraud Case
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday sidestepped a significant decision regarding a securities fraud lawsuit against Meta's Facebook. Shareholders accuse the social media giant of misleading investors about a significant misuse of user data.

The lawsuit, led by Amalgamated Bank, contends that Facebook violated the Securities Exchange Act by not disclosing a 2015 data breach by Cambridge Analytica. This misconduct allegedly resulted in a substantial loss in stock value in 2018 after media reports surfaced.

Despite Facebook's appeal for a dismissal, claiming risk disclosures are inherently forward-looking, the Supreme Court's refusal leaves a lower court's decision intact, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. Investors remain determined to seek damages, as Facebook continues to defend its position in district court.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback