Wyoming Court Blocks Anti-Abortion Laws, Upholds Constitutional Rights
A Wyoming judge has ruled two anti-abortion laws unconstitutional, maintaining abortion legality in the state. The judge argued the laws violated the state constitution by restricting women's healthcare decisions. This decision highlights ongoing legal debates following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 ruling on abortion rights.
A Wyoming judge has ruled that two recent anti-abortion laws violate the state constitution, thus keeping abortion legal. Teton County District Court Judge Melissa Owens issued a permanent injunction against the 'Life is a Human Right Act' and a separate medical abortion ban, according to local media reports.
The decision was based on a constitutional provision giving competent adults the right to make their own healthcare decisions. Judge Owens argued that the laws imposed unreasonable restrictions on women's healthcare rights throughout their pregnancies and were neither reasonable nor necessary for protecting public health and welfare.
The judge criticized the legislation for not distinguishing between different stages of fetal development. She noted that the state’s officials, including Governor Mark Gordon and Attorney General Bridget Hill, failed to justify why pregnant women should be excluded from constitutional protections. This ruling reflects a broader national debate post the 2022 Supreme Court decision that transferred abortion lawmaking to individual states.
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- Wyoming
- abortion
- legal
- judge
- constitution
- healthcare
- rights
- Zygote
- fetus
- law
ALSO READ
New York's Equal Rights Amendment: A Constitutional Crossroads
India's Healthcare Revolution: V K Paul's Vision for a Future-Ready Bharat
Election Divides: Immigration and Abortion Rights Shape Voter Choices
Tech Mahindra Foundation Launches Healthcare-Careers Portal
Restoring Trust: Eradicating Unethical Practices in Healthcare Sector