Controversy Over Constitutional Amendments in Bangladesh Unveiled

Bangladesh's attorney general proposes removing 'secularism' and 'socialism' from the Constitution, questioning provisions from the 15th amendment. These changes, implemented by the now-ousted Awami League regime, face scrutiny. Advocates argue such restrictions stifle democratic change, urging restoration of the caretaker government system.

The top legal authority in Bangladesh has stirred controversy by suggesting the removal of 'secularism' and 'socialism' from the national Constitution. This proposal, made in the High Court, has sparked widespread debate over the principles that define the nation.

Attorney General Mohammad Asazzaman took a firm stance against the 15th amendment, initially instituted by the Awami League in 2011, highlighting its contentious provisions. The amendment, although restoring secularism, faced criticism for abolishing the caretaker government system and for provisions perceived to stifle democratic evolution.

Critics, including Asaduzzaman, argue that elements of the amendment challenge democratic processes and dismiss the determined efforts of citizens who opposed the previous governance structure. The attorney general calls for reinstating more democratic avenues, notably the caretaker government system.

(With inputs from agencies.)