The Trump Conundrum: Sentencing Dilemma Amid Presidency

Judge Juan Merchan faces a complex decision regarding the sentencing of President-elect Donald Trump, following his conviction on 34 felony counts. Options include delaying sentencing, granting immunity, waiting for federal court rulings, or dismissing the case, amidst constitutional concerns and Trump's presidential duties.

Judge Juan Merchan of New York is confronted with a perplexing challenge following Donald Trump's election victory. The judge must decide whether to proceed with sentencing Trump for his felony conviction or delay it, considering Trump's upcoming responsibilities as president-elect. As per court documents, Merchan has postponed the case until November 19, pondering the potential implications on Trump's constitutional duties.

Trump's legal team has urged the judge to annul the verdict, marking the first criminal conviction of a former and future U.S. president. Meanwhile, Manhattan prosecutors are seeking a balanced resolution that acknowledges both the jury's decision and Trump's presidential obligations.

The scenarios under consideration include waiting until Trump completes his presidency in 2029, dismissing the case by recognizing immunity claims, or holding off until federal court rulings on jurisdictional transfers. Each option presents unique legal and constitutional challenges amid the unprecedented circumstances.

(With inputs from agencies.)