New Criminal Laws Replace British-Era Statutes: Mixed Reactions Surface

India has introduced three new criminal laws, replacing British-era statutes. Reactions are mixed, with some legal experts calling them a modernizing step, while others see them as superficial changes. Key changes include timelines for trials and the use of technology. The Bar Council of India supports the reforms.

India's introduction of three new criminal laws, replacing longstanding British-era statutes, has sparked diverse reactions among legal experts. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) came into effect on July 1, sweeping away the Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, and Indian Evidence Act, respectively.

While senior advocates like Adish C Aggarwala and Mahesh Jethmalani view the changes as a significant step towards modernizing the criminal justice system, others such as Abhishek Singhvi and Manish Tewari criticize them as cosmetic and draconian. Singhvi lamented, 'An opportunity to make genuine reforms has been wasted,' citing the persistent backlog of cases in trial courts.

The Bar Council of India has endorsed the laws and discouraged immediate protests. Notably, the new statutes introduce specific timelines for trials and judgments, which are expected to expedite the judicial process. Former Supreme Court Bar Association president Aggarwala praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for the reforms aimed at decolonizing Indian law.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)