How AI can be both sustainable and accessible for global innovation

The environmental cost of AI has been well documented, with the development and deployment of large-scale AI models consuming massive computational power. Training advanced models requires significant energy, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, electronic waste, and water consumption for cooling data centers.


CO-EDP, VisionRICO-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 06-03-2025 10:20 IST | Created: 06-03-2025 10:20 IST
How AI can be both sustainable and accessible for global innovation
Representative Image. Credit: ChatGPT

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force across industries, but its rapid expansion raises concerns about sustainability. While much of the conversation focuses on AI’s environmental impact, social and economic sustainability are often overlooked. A recent study titled “Climate And Resource Awareness is Imperative to Achieving Sustainable AI (and Preventing a Global AI Arms Race)” by Pedram Bakhtiarifard, Pınar Tözün, Christian Igel, and Raghavendra Selvan, published in arXiv, argues that achieving sustainable AI requires balancing climate awareness - the need to mitigate AI’s environmental footprint - and resource awareness, which ensures equitable access to AI development infrastructure. The study introduces the Climate and Resource Aware Machine Learning (CARAML) framework, offering actionable strategies for achieving a truly sustainable AI ecosystem.

The tension between climate and resource awareness

The environmental cost of AI has been well documented, with the development and deployment of large-scale AI models consuming massive computational power. Training advanced models requires significant energy, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, electronic waste, and water consumption for cooling data centers. The expansion of AI infrastructure further exacerbates environmental challenges, as hardware production and data center operations demand increasing amounts of natural resources.

However, while reducing AI’s environmental impact is crucial, limiting access to computational resources in the name of sustainability creates a barrier for researchers, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study highlights the risk of AI becoming an exclusive tool controlled by high-income countries (HICs) with access to extensive computing power. Disparities in AI accessibility exacerbate existing inequalities in research and innovation, creating a divide between those who can leverage AI for societal advancements and those left behind due to resource constraints. To resolve this contradiction, the study calls for a balanced approach that considers both environmental sustainability and inclusive access to AI infrastructure.

The role of the CARAML framework

To address the dual challenges of climate and resource awareness, the study proposes the Climate and Resource Aware Machine Learning (CARAML) framework. This framework promotes AI sustainability through multi-level actions spanning individuals, communities, industries, governments, and global institutions. At the individual level, researchers are encouraged to adopt energy-efficient machine learning techniques, share computational resources, and report carbon footprints of AI projects. The study suggests that integrating sustainability metrics into AI performance evaluations can lead to more responsible model development.

At the industry level, AI companies and cloud providers are urged to develop transparent sustainability reporting mechanisms, improve energy efficiency in data centers, and promote open-source AI models that allow broader accessibility. Governments, in turn, play a crucial role in regulating AI’s environmental impact while ensuring that AI infrastructure remains accessible to researchers in LMICs. The study calls for policies that encourage investment in green AI solutions while preventing monopolization of AI capabilities by a few dominant players.

AI democratization and ethical considerations

The study warns against an AI arms race, where powerful entities - whether corporations or nations - compete to dominate AI capabilities, often at the expense of ethical considerations and sustainability. It emphasizes the importance of AI democratization, ensuring that advancements in machine learning benefit a global audience rather than remaining concentrated among a privileged few. Encouraging AI sovereignty - where countries maintain control over their own AI development - must be balanced with international cooperation to prevent AI research from being used as a tool for economic and political power struggles.

Additionally, ethical considerations must be integrated into AI sustainability efforts. The study highlights how efficiency-focused AI models can sometimes compromise fairness and inclusivity. For instance, resource-efficient AI solutions may reinforce biases or exclude underrepresented communities due to limited data availability. This paradox underscores the need for AI systems that are not only computationally sustainable but also socially responsible.

The path forward for sustainable AI

The research underscores that the future of AI must be guided by a holistic approach that balances environmental and social sustainability. AI should be developed with an awareness of both its energy consumption and its accessibility to researchers and practitioners worldwide. The study suggests that the pursuit of Sustainable AI should not be driven solely by reducing AI’s carbon footprint but also by ensuring that its benefits are equitably distributed.

The proposed CARAML framework offers a structured pathway to achieving this balance, advocating for energy-efficient AI models, equitable access to AI resources, and ethical AI governance. By adopting these strategies, AI can be a force for positive global change without exacerbating climate change or reinforcing socio-economic disparities. As AI continues to advance, prioritizing sustainability at every stage of development will be crucial in shaping a responsible and inclusive technological future.

  • FIRST PUBLISHED IN:
  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback