Sibal Condemns Dhankhar: A Constitutional Clash
Kapil Sibal criticized Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar for his remarks about the judiciary's role, deeming them unconstitutional. Sibal stressed the importance of maintaining equidistance in political roles and defended the judiciary's independence. He called for a review if there are issues with judicial decisions.
- Country:
- India
Kapil Sibal, a member of the Rajya Sabha, has launched a scathing critique against Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar's recent comments regarding the judiciary's timelines for presidential decisions. Sibal labeled Dhankhar's statements as "unconstitutional" and out of line for a Rajya Sabha chairman.
Speaking a day after Dhankhar's remarks, Sibal emphasized the necessity for the Lok Sabha Speaker and Rajya Sabha Chairman to remain impartial, noting that neither can serve as a political party's spokesperson. He stressed that any deviation undermines the chair's dignity.
Sibal defended Article 142, which allows the Supreme Court to ensure complete justice. He urged that constitutional balance must be maintained and that judicial independence is crucial for democracy. Sibal also questioned Dhankhar's selective criticism of historical political events.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
India's Quest for Resource Independence: Unlocking Domestic Rare Earths
Waller's Promise: Defending the Fed's Independence
The Powell Succession: Waller's Bid to Uphold Fed Independence
EU Court Rules: Poland's Judicial Independence in Question
Trump's Third Term Dream: Constitutional Twist or Political Tease?

