Mexican Judge Halts Debate on Controversial Judicial Reform

A Mexican judge has ordered a temporary halt on the Lower House of Congress debating a judicial reform proposed by President Lopez Obrador. The reform, which would elect judges by popular vote, has faced criticism from the U.S. and Canada. Critics argue it threatens judicial independence while supporters believe it will enhance democracy.

A Mexican judge has issued an order to the Lower House of Congress to pause discussions on a contentious judicial reform expected to be debated in early September, according to legal documents seen by Reuters on Saturday.

The judicial reform, advocated by Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, has led to diplomatic tensions with the United States and alarmed global financial markets. District Judge Martha Eugenia Magaña López in Morelos issued the injunction due to concerns regarding judicial workers' labor rights.

The proposed reform involves electing approximately 7,000 judges, magistrates, and justices through popular vote, lowering experience and age requirements, and reducing the size of the Supreme Court. Supporters argue it will democratize the judiciary, but critics warn it might undermine judicial careers, enhance executive power, and increase vulnerability to criminal influence.

The judge's temporary block will prevent lawmakers from proceeding with discussions until September 4 when a decision on a permanent suspension will be made. However, historical precedence raises doubts if the order will be respected.

U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ken Salazar has labeled the overhaul a significant threat to Mexican democracy, a stance echoed by the Canadian government. In retaliation, Lopez Obrador has paused relations with the Canadian and U.S. embassies, though not with the countries themselves.

The Morena party and its coalition dominate the Lower House with a two-thirds majority and lack just one seat for a similar control in the Senate.

(With inputs from agencies.)