Iran's Presidential Face-Off: Reformist vs. Hardliner in Final Round

Iran's presidential candidates, Masoud Pezeshkian and Saeed Jalili, challenge each other's qualifications and visions in a heated debate ahead of Friday's runoff election. Both candidates promise various reforms but clash on foreign policy, economic strategies, and addressing the country's numerous issues.

Tensions escalated Monday as Iran's presidential candidates, Masoud Pezeshkian and Saeed Jalili, exchanged sharp accusations during a live debate, preparing for Friday's decisive runoff election to succeed the late President Ebrahim Raisi.

Reformist candidate Pezeshkian criticized Jalili's lack of managerial experience, questioning his capability to govern. On the other hand, Jalili, renowned as the 'Living Martyr' from the Iran-Iraq war, defended his track record, asserting a robust approach to nuclear negotiations and promising 8% economic growth annually.

Both candidates pledged to improve Iran's economy, strengthen foreign relations, and address societal issues. However, they starkly differed on how to achieve these goals, leaving the electorate with clear choices as they head to the polls.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)