North Carolina Appeals Court Ruling Could Flip Supreme Court Election
A North Carolina appeals court ruled in favor of Republican Jefferson Griffin in a contentious Supreme Court election, potentially flipping the results. The court identified issues with tens of thousands of ballots, primarily involving missing voter ID information and residency requirements, creating a possible path for the election outcome to change.

- Country:
- United States
In a significant development, a North Carolina appeals court has sided with Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin in a contentious state Supreme Court election, potentially altering the outcome of the nation's only undecided 2024 race. The court's decision requires electoral authorities to revisit their ballot evaluation process.
Judges have questioned the validity of tens of thousands of ballots due to missing voter identification details and residency verification, creating a possibility for a dramatic shift in results. Democratic candidate Allison Riggs, currently holding a narrow lead, has vowed to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court.
The court's decision casts doubt over the legitimacy of the ballot counting process, with Griffin's campaign arguing that improperly cast ballots could hinder a fair election outcome. With implications for over 65,000 ballots, the ruling promotes ensuring a lawful voting process while paving the way for further legal challenges.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Wisconsin votes to enshrine voter ID requirement in state constitution, reports AP.
House Votes to Limit Nationwide Injunctions: A Challenge to Judicial Power
Dalit Votes: A Tug of War in Uttar Pradesh Politics
Unexpected Triumph: Daniel Noboa Leads by 1 Million Votes in Ecuador's Presidential Race
Gabon Votes: A New Era After Decades of Political Dynasty