Judge Halts Mass Firing of Federal Workers
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated procedures by terminating thousands of probationary federal workers without proper notification in 19 states and Washington, D.C. The ruling requires reinstatement only for employees in states that sued the administration. The case remains unresolved as the administration appeals.

The Trump administration's attempt to dismiss thousands of probationary federal workers has faced a legal setback. A federal judge, James Bredar, restricted an earlier ruling, emphasizing that the administration bypassed necessary protocols by not notifying states and local governments ahead of the February mass termination.
The judge's decision mandates the reinstatement of employees only in Democratic-led states that contested the move. Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown refuted the administration's claims of poor performance, labeling the dismissals as a coordinated attempt to diminish the federal workforce unlawfully.
The Trump administration, appealing the decision, maintains the legality of their actions. However, a U.S. appeals court has upheld the judge's ruling pending further litigation, which may take extended time to resolve.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Social Security Agency Scandal: Privacy Breach and Legal Setback
Marine Le Pen's Legal Setback Shakes French Politics
Mass Layoffs Shake US Health and Human Services: A New Era Begins
Mass Layoffs Rock U.S. Health Agencies under Trump Administration
Mass Layoffs Rock U.S. Health Agencies Amid Federal Downsizing