Government Rebuts X Corp's 'Censorship' Claims on Sahyog Portal
The Centre has strongly objected to X Corp's characterization of the Sahyog portal as a 'censorship' tool, emphasizing it as a facilitative mechanism. The government argued that Sections 69A and 79 of the IT Act provide specific powers and obligations, countering claims of misuse and misinterpretation by X Corp.

- Country:
- India
The Centre has rejected X Corp's portrayal of the Sahyog portal as a "censorship" instrument, dubbing the claims as "unfortunate" and "condemnable." In a detailed rebuttal to the Karnataka High Court, the government highlighted X Corp's misinterpretation of the IT Act's Sections 69A and 79.
According to X Corp, Section 79(3)(b) does not permit the government to issue content-blocking orders without adhering to Section 69A safeguards. However, the Centre clarified that Section 69A authorizes blocking orders under specified conditions, distinct from Section 79(3)(b) notifications.
The government defended the Sahyog portal as a structured platform for swift action against illegal online content, benefiting both intermediaries and law enforcement. It criticized X Corp for misrepresenting its role, reiterating that the existing framework is clear and apt.
(With inputs from agencies.)