Supreme Court Advocates for Rigorous Police Reforms

The Supreme Court is set to revisit its 2006 directives on police reforms, focusing on separating investigation from law and order duties. Despite guidelines for transparent appointments of senior police officers, states have flouted these mandates, prompting the court to hear pleas for stricter compliance.

The Supreme Court has announced it will examine in May the petitions urging enforcement of its 2006 ruling on police reforms. The landmark verdict suggested essential measures, including the segregation of investigation and law and order responsibilities within the police force.

The 2006 decision also stipulated that state governments should abstain from making ad hoc or interim appointments to the post of Director General of Police. The Union Public Service Commission, working alongside state governments, is tasked to shortlist three senior officers for the DGP position, allowing states to make merit-based appointments.

Concerns about persistent corrupt practices in appointing police chiefs were voiced by lawyer Prashant Bhushan and senior advocate Dushyant Dave. They informed the Chief Justice of India and other judges that states frequently violate the court's directives. Consequently, the court has scheduled proceedings for May, emphasizing the urgent need for adherence to judicial guidelines.

(With inputs from agencies.)