Controversy Surrounds West Bengal's OBC Status Review: A Courtroom Drama
The West Bengal government's decision to review the backwardness criteria is under Supreme Court scrutiny after the Calcutta High Court deemed previous OBC designations illegal, citing religious bias. The state's backward classes commission is re-evaluating these classifications, with the process expected to conclude in three months.

- Country:
- India
On Tuesday, the West Bengal government informed India's Supreme Court that the state commission for backward classes is currently re-evaluating the issue of backwardness. This action follows a controversial ruling by the Calcutta High Court that struck down OBC status for several communities, claiming the previous designations were based on religious criteria.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing West Bengal, requested the court to revisit the matter in three months, by which time the ongoing review is expected to be completed. The bench, noting Sibal's submission, agreed to schedule the hearing for July, while clarifying that the process would not affect current parties' rights involved in the case.
This development arises from legal challenges to the May 2024 Calcutta High Court verdict, which nullified the OBC status granted to certain castes since 2010. The higher court criticized the state's previous reservation decisions, noting that they affected public job and educational opportunities. However, positions already filled remain unaffected by this judicial decision.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
NEP denies assistance amount to SCs, STs and Other Backward classes, alleges CM Stalin addressing party rally in Tamil Nadu.
Telangana Pushes Landmark Quota Increase for Backward Classes
Quicker the issue of lack of faith in Election Commission is dealt with, greater chance of saving democracy: Kapil Sibal.
Judiciary in Question: Kapil Sibal Challenges the System
INDIA must appear to be a ‘bloc and not un-bloc’ itself in public domain: Kapil Sibal to PTI.