Supreme Court Probes Aviation Incident Involving BJP MPs
The Supreme Court questioned Jharkhand CID's investigation of BJP MPs under the Aircraft Act, which is under DGCA's jurisdiction. The case involves a post-sunset flight takeoff, allegedly breaking protocols. The Jharkhand government's appeal challenges a High Court decision emphasizing procedural sanctions.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court on Wednesday scrutinized the Jharkhand CID's investigation involving two BJP MPs, questioning why the case wasn't under the DGCA's jurisdiction. The BJP MPs, Nishikant Dubey and Manoj Tiwari, were accused of coercing air traffic control to permit a post-sunset takeoff, potentially breaching aviation protocols.
The court asked the state's lawyer about the suitability of the CID probing cases under the Aircraft Act, considering it falls under the Directorate General of Civil Aviation's purview. This issue arose from an FIR in Deoghar district, contested in a March 2023 High Court ruling due to procedural lapses regarding MP immunity.
The Supreme Court asked Jharkhand to provide supporting judgments for proceeding without prior sanction, as it reserved judgment on the jurisdiction issue. Meanwhile, Dubey's defense argued the flight adhered to aviation norms, departing within acceptable sunset time limits, suggesting political interference.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
India's Aviation Evolution: New Bill to Replace 1934 Aircraft Act
Revamp of 90-Year-Old Aircraft Act Signals Aviation Transformation
Congress moves privilege motion against BJP leaders Nishikant Dubey, Sambit Patra for "derogatory remarks" against Rahul Gandhi
Parliament passes Bharatiya Vayuyan Vidheyak 2024, replacing 90-year-old Aircraft Act.
Tensions Escalate: Chinese Aircraft Activity Near Taiwan