India's Marital Rape Conundrum: Legal Immunity Under Scrutiny

The Indian Supreme Court deferred a significant hearing on the immunity granted to husbands in cases of marital rape, citing time constraints before Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud steps down. The legal discourse is vital, involving various top legal advocates and examining the constitutional validity of existing penal codes.

In a significant legal maneuver, the Indian Supreme Court has postponed a pivotal hearing addressing the contentious issue of marital rape immunity. The decision was influenced by time constraints and the impending retirement of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, who will step down from office on November 10.

A bench led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, initiated the final hearing on October 17. However, faced with comprehensive arguments from senior advocates, the court acknowledged the improbability of concluding discussions within the remaining working days before Diwali vacation.

The matter, regarded as one of profound sensitivity, involves key legal figures, including Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, and explores the constitutional legitimacy of penal provisions that grant husbands immunity in marital rape cases, sparking nationwide discourse on women's rights and legal reform.

(With inputs from agencies.)