Judicial Discretion in FIR Registration: Delhi Court Ruling Explained

A Delhi court ruled that directing the police to file an FIR is a serious judicial discretion, not a formality, in response to a man's plea challenging a magistrate's order declining FIR registration against his wife. The court found no fault in the magistrate's decision.

In a recent ruling, a Delhi court clarified that instructing police to file a First Information Report (FIR) involves serious judicial discretion. This observation came from additional sessions judge Purshotam Pathak during the hearing of a revision plea filed by a man challenging a lower court's refusal to lodge an FIR against his wife.

The court emphasized that such orders should be issued only if there is clear evidence indicating a cognizable offense, requiring complex and scientific evidence collection. The ruling highlighted the need for a thoughtful review of each case's context and justice interest.

The case, involving allegations of physical assault amid a matrimonial dispute, saw the court upholding the magistrate's decision. According to the police's status report, both parties were involved in multiple legal disputes, and the man had not specified any evidence justifying police investigation.

(With inputs from agencies.)