Delhi High Court's Pivotal Proceedings: Climate Activism, Admission Disputes, and POCSO Case Delays

The Delhi High Court addressed significant cases, from a climate activist's plea to protest at Jantar Mantar, to compliance issues with minority admissions at St. Stephen's College, and procedural inefficiencies in granting compensation to POCSO survivors, highlighting systemic discontent and legal complexities.

The Delhi High Court convened on Tuesday to delve into pressing cases that spanned climate activism, academic admissions, and legal procedural reform. Notably, the court scheduled a hearing on a plea by climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, seeking permission for a protest at Jantar Mantar or another viable venue in Delhi.

In another significant matter, the court identified the University of Delhi in 'wilful disobedience' concerning a previous order on minority student admissions at St. Stephen's College's postgraduate programs. This case underscores ongoing challenges in adhering to judicial mandates in educational settings.

The court also highlighted a troubling disconnect between POCSO courts and legal services, mandating the implementation of a standard operating procedure to expedite compensation for sexual offence survivors. These cases collectively reflect critical intersections of justice and policy enforcement.

(With inputs from agencies.)