Trump's Post-Election Legal Challenges: Immunity on the Line
Federal prosecutors claim former President Donald Trump resorted to criminal activities after losing the 2020 election. A recent court filing argues that Trump should not be immune from prosecution for his efforts to overturn the election results, describing them as private rather than official acts.
- Country:
- United States
In a provocative court filing unsealed on Wednesday, federal prosecutors have argued that former President Donald Trump committed crimes after his 2020 election defeat. The filing, from special counsel Jack Smith's team, challenges Trump's claim to immunity based on a recent Supreme Court opinion.
The opinion provided broad immunity for official acts by former presidents. However, prosecutors contend that Trump's actions, which allegedly included attempts to convince former Vice President Mike Pence to ignore electoral votes, were personal rather than official, and thus shouldn't be protected.
According to the filing, Trump's initiative to remain in power involved private co-conspirators and criminal methods to disrupt the electoral process. Prosecutors are urging US District Judge Tanya Chutkan to uphold the charges in the ongoing indictment.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Supreme Court seeks CBI response in Balwan Khokhar plea in 1984 anti-Sikh riots case
Supreme Court to Review Controversial Places of Worship Act
Supreme Court Challenge: New Criminal Laws Under Scrutiny
US Supreme Court to weigh bid to sue Palestinian authorities over attacks
Pakistan Supreme Court to hear Imran Khan's May 9 probe petition on December 10