Canada's Assisted Death Framework Faces Legal Challenge

Disability rights groups have challenged the constitutionality of Canada's framework for medically assisted death. They argue that providing assisted death to people whose death is not imminently foreseeable violates their rights. This legal action follows concerns that the newer Track 2 option could lead disabled individuals to end their lives unnecessarily.

Disability rights groups are questioning the constitutionality of Canada's framework for medically assisted death, arguing that it breaches individuals' rights when their death is not 'reasonably foreseeable.' The legal challenge posits that offering assisted death under these circumstances violates rights to equality and life, liberty, and security.

In Canada, medically assisted death is legally permitted under specific conditions via two tracks: one for individuals with a 'reasonably foreseeable' death and another for those whose demise is not imminent. While the first track is more widely used, Track 2 is gaining traction.

'Track 2 increases the risk that persons with a disability will be induced to end their lives as a response to suffering,' states the notice of application filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The challenge highlights cases where individuals were advised on assisted death options despite seeking care to live, sparking serious concerns among disability advocates.

(With inputs from agencies.)