One Nation, One Election: Unity in Diversity or Constitutional Challenge?

The Joint Parliamentary Committee on One Nation, One Election discussed the feasibility and implications of simultaneous elections. Key issues include reduced costs, improved governance, and necessary constitutional amendments. Concerns involve logistical challenges and accommodating regional issues. The next meeting is set for April 2 to continue deliberations.

The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) convened a significant meeting to explore the concept of 'One Nation, One Election' (ONOE), lasting over five hours. Former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, DN Patel, and Attorney General of India, R Venkataramani, presented their insights, underscoring the initiative's potential national benefits.

Patel highlighted cost reductions, improved governance, and a streamlined electoral process. However, logistical challenges, including the deployment of EVMs, security, and staffing, were acknowledged. BJP MP Bhartruhari Mahtab noted the meeting's productivity, driven by expert analysis.

The proposal, while promising efficiency and financial benefits, demands careful constitutional amendments to avoid disrupting India's federal structure. Concerns about unifying regional and national elections persist, emphasizing the need for clarity on the role of regional parties in this initiative.

(With inputs from agencies.)