Delhi High Court Permits Representation to End Singhu Border Blockade

The Delhi High Court has allowed a petitioner to seek the removal of the extensive blockade at the Singhu border from the Delhi Police Commissioner. The blockade, originally set up during a farmers' protest, has caused significant traffic disruptions and hardship for commuters for several months.

The Delhi High Court on Monday granted permission for a petitioner to make a representation to the Delhi Police Commissioner regarding the removal of the extensive blockade at the Singhu border (NH-44). The petitioner had sought a directive for the blockade's removal, arguing it hindered traffic flow and offered no alternative routes for commuters.

After instructing the petitioner to approach the police commissioner, the Delhi High Court bench led by Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela dismissed the plea. The case, filed by Shankar Mor, Sachin Aneja, and Shivam Dhamija, was presented through their advocates in the Delhi High Court. The petitioners argued that the Singhu border blockade has caused significant inconvenience by forcing commuters onto ancillary roads, many in poor condition.

The roadblock was originally placed as a part of security measures to prevent farmers from reaching Delhi during a protest earlier this year after failed negotiations between farmers' organizations and the Union Government. Petitioners argued the blockade has remained despite no ongoing protests, leading to massive traffic jams and delays, particularly for those seeking medical treatment and essential services.

The blockade's prolonged presence has caused substantial disruption, including delays for workers traveling between Delhi, Gurugram, and Panipat, and considerable inconvenience to the public. The petition emphasized the need for immediate relief, citing the unnecessary hardship imposed on residents requiring timely medical care and essential services due to the extended road closure.

(With inputs from agencies.)