House to make another attempt at reauthorizing US spy program following Republican dissent

House Republicans will try again Friday to advance a bill that would reauthorise a crucial national security surveillance programme, a second attempt just days after a conservative revolt prevented similar legislation from reaching the floor.Speaker Mike Johnson is expected to bring forward a Plan B that would reform and extend a section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act known as Section 702 for a shortened period of two years, instead of the full five-year reauthorisation first proposed, in hopes that the shorter timeline will sway GOP critics.Were going to try to find a way to unlock the rule.

House Republicans will try again Friday to advance a bill that would reauthorise a crucial national security surveillance programme, a second attempt just days after a conservative revolt prevented similar legislation from reaching the floor.

Speaker Mike Johnson is expected to bring forward a Plan B that would reform and extend a section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act known as Section 702 for a shortened period of two years, instead of the full five-year reauthorisation first proposed, in hopes that the shorter timeline will sway GOP critics.

"We're going to try to find a way to unlock the rule. And I think it's possible," Johnson told reporters Wednesday evening, referring to the step needed to bring up the legislation. "I mean, there are some differences of opinion. But I think everyone — most everyone — understands the necessity of getting this right and getting it done." It is unclear if Johnson, who has called the programme "critical" to national security, will have the Republican support necessary to move ahead.

Scepticism of the government's spy powers has grown dramatically in recent years, particularly on the right. Republicans have clashed for months over what a legislative overhaul of the surveillance programme should look like, creating divisions that spilled onto the House floor this week as 19 Republicans broke with their party to prevent the bill from coming up for a vote.

However, some of the original opponents signalled their support for the new plan late Thursday.

"The two-year timeframe is a much better landing spot because it gives us two years to see if any of this works rather than kicking it out five years," Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said Thursday. ''They say these reforms are going to work. Well, I guess we'll find out." The legislation in question would permit the US government to collect, without a warrant, the communications of non-Americans located outside the country to gather foreign intelligence. The reauthorisation is currently tied to a series of reforms aimed at satisfying critics who complained of civil liberties violations against Americans.

But far-right opponents have complained that those changes did not go far enough. Among the detractors are some of Johnson's harshest critics, members of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, who have railed against the speaker the last several months for reaching across the aisle to carry out the basic functions of the government.

To appease some of those critics, Johnson plans to bring forward next week a separate proposal that would close a loophole that allows US officials to collect data on Americans from big tech companies without a warrant.

"All of that added up to something that I think gave a greater deal of comfort," Roy said.

House passage of the bill is dependent on GOP support as Democrats on Thursday ruled out helping Johnson break the impasse on the legislation.

Though the programme is technically set to expire April 19, the Biden administration has said it expects its authority to collect intelligence to remain operational for at least another year, thanks to an opinion earlier this month from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which receives surveillance applications. But officials say that court approval shouldn't be a substitute for congressional authorization, especially since communications companies could cease cooperation with the government.

First authorised in 2008, the spy tool has been renewed several times since then as US officials see it as crucial in disrupting terror attacks, cyber intrusions and foreign espionage. It has also produced intelligence that the US has relied on for specific operations.

But the administration's efforts to secure reauthorisation of the programme have repeatedly encountered fierce, and bipartisan, pushback, with Democrats like Sen. Ron Wyden who have long championed civil liberties aligning with Republican supporters of former President Donald Trump, who in a post on Truth Social on Wednesday stated incorrectly that Section 702 had been used to spy on his presidential campaign.

"Kill FISA," Trump wrote in all capital letters. "It was illegally used against me, and many others. They spied on my campaign." A former adviser to his 2016 presidential campaign was targeted for surveillance over potential ties to Russia under a different section of the law.

A specific area of concern for lawmakers is the FBI's use of the vast intelligence repository to search for information about Americans and others in the US. Though the surveillance programme only targets non-Americans in other countries, it also collects communications of Americans when they are in contact with those targeted foreigners.

In the past year, US officials have revealed a series of abuses and mistakes by FBI analysts in improperly querying the intelligence repository for information about Americans or others in the US, including about a member of Congress and participants in the racial justice protests of 2020 and the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol.

Those violations have led to demands for the FBI to have a warrant before conducting database queries on Americans, which FBI director Chris Wray has warned would effectively gut the program's effectiveness and would also be legally unnecessary given that the information in the database has already been lawfully collected.

"While it is imperative that we ensure this critical authority of 702 does not lapse, we also must not undercut the effectiveness of this essential tool with a warrant requirement or some similar restriction, paralysing our ability to tackle fast-moving threats," Wray said in a speech Tuesday.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)